Home > News > Court Denies Review in Ogilvy Case  
 

Supreme Court Denies Review in Ogilvie Case, First District Court of Appeal Decision Stands

In 2009 we reported about the Ogilvie case decided by the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB).  At issue was how parties to a Workers’ Compensation case can rebut the permanent disability rating schedule to prove a more accurate permanent disability rating for an injured worker.  The original Ogilvie decision dealt with an algebraic formula used to determine an injured worker’s reduction in future earnings capacity.  The permanent disability rating schedule takes into consideration a reduction in future earnings in determining a final disability rating.

Over the last two years, the Ogilvie case has proceeded through the court system and ultimately the First District Court of Appeal issued a decision now known as Ogilvie III.  Ultimately, the First District Court of Appeal held that there are three techniques to show that a rating under the 2005 permanent disability rating schedule is inaccurate, and rejected the earlier determination by the WCAB and how it instructed a party to rebut the injured worker’s diminished future earning capacity. 

The Workers’ Compensation attorneys at Gordon, Edelstein, Krepack, Grant, Felton and Goldstein, LLP have been following this case over the last two years.  We believe that the determination by the First District Court of Appeal (Ogilvie III) was appropriate, and the refusal to review their decision by the Supreme Court was appropriate. 

It remains to be seen which of the three techniques applied in an individual case may prove to alter an injured worker’s rating and result in a more accurate permanent disability rating.  It is clear that there will be additional litigation regarding this issue as the new rule of law is applied in cases going forward.

It is our sense that the tools the Ogilvie III decision provides may be used and are appropriate in a limited number of Workers’ Compensation cases.  It is important to have a skilled attorney in Workers’ Compensation matters review the facts of each individual case to determine if the Ogilvie III decision might be applied to increase a permanent disability award. 

 

 

 

 
Free Case Evaluation

 

 

   

Do I Have a Case?

Contact us by Email
for a free Case Evaluation

Bicycle Advocacy

Learn how we work with
the Community on bike issues.

The Geklaw App
GEKLAW App Download the iPhone/iPad App
Download the Android App
Learn more >
Geklaw Enewsletter

Follow our news.

News

Learn the latest from the Geklaw team.

Bayer Settles 70 Product Liability Claims Involving Two of its Oral Contraceptives
Seven GEK Attorneys Named as 2012 Super Lawyers
GEK Sponsors the Police Unity Tour, Southern California Chapter VII
GEK Attorneys Reach Substantial Settlement in Premises Liability Case
Supreme Court Denies Review in Ogilvie Case, First District Court of Appeal Decision Stands
  More News »


213.739.7000 direct | 213.386.1671 fax

     

Personal Injury

Personal Injury
Our Attorneys
Taking Injuries Personally
Free Case Evaluation

Workers' Compensation

Workers' Compensation
Our Attorneys
Hurt at Work?
Free Case Evaluation

More ON OUR PRACTICE

Testimonials
Ventura Attorneys

Social Security Disability Appeals
Bicycle Law
Public Safety Officers
GEK in Action
GEK News
Consumer Alerts

SHARE

FacebookJoin us on Facebook
GEKLAW AppLearn about the Geklaw App

© 2012 Gordon, Edelstein, Krepack, Grant, Felton & Goldstein, LLP  · Personal injury Lawyers Los Angeles  ·  Disclaimer  ·  Privacy  ·  Articles ·  Site Map

Bar RegisterOffice Locations:
3580 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1800—Los Angeles, CA 90010
816 Camarillo Spring Road, Suite I, Camarillo, CA 93012 (serving Northern Los Angeles, Ventura and Santa Barbara counties)

LEGAL DISCLAIMER: This web site is for informational purposes only.
If you are seeking legal advice or representation, please contact us at 213 739-7000.

Pursuant to Labor Code Section 5432(a), making a false or fraudulent workers' compensation claim is a felony subject to up to 5 years in prison
or a fine of up to $50,000 or double the value of the fraud, whichever is greater, or by both imprisonment and fine.